fix(instance): image: allow multiple additional volumes #3266
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mia-Cross added enhancement documentation instance Mia-Cross force-pushed the instance_image_additional_volumes_update branch from 35070c6 to a7af3df Compare Mia-Cross changed the title Mia-Cross force-pushed the instance_image_additional_volumes_update branch from ddbfd8c to 7b7fe08 Compare Mia-Cross changed the title Mia-Cross force-pushed the instance_image_additional_volumes_update branch from 5f63aa2 to f806f64 Compare 
Mia-Cross force-pushed the instance_image_additional_volumes_update branch from 868608b to 4c7127d Compare 
remyleone approved these changes Oct 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instance images now support more than 1 additional volume so we should remove the
MaxItems: 1restriction. The tests and the documentation have been updated in consequence.Also there was a typo in the documentation's examples with additional_volumes, the computed
additional_volumesfield was referenced instead of the configurableadditional_volume_idsfield.Closes #2818