Skip to content

Conversation

bjaglin
Copy link
Contributor

@bjaglin bjaglin commented Jul 15, 2022

scalameta/scalameta#2684, first released in scalameta 4.5.1 (scalafix 0.10.0), changed a behavior, so this takes a more intrusive but also more robust approach so that the rule works with scalafix 0.10.x.

@bjaglin bjaglin changed the title Update/sbt scalafix 0.10.0 scalafix 0.10.1 Jul 15, 2022
@bjaglin bjaglin force-pushed the update/sbt-scalafix-0.10.0 branch from 5a614d8 to e8bcd20 Compare July 15, 2022 14:33
scalameta/scalameta#2684, first released in scalameta 4.5.1 (scalafix 0.10.0), changed a behavior, so this takes a more intrusive but also more robust approach so that the rule works with scalafix 0.10.x.
@bjaglin bjaglin force-pushed the update/sbt-scalafix-0.10.0 branch from e8bcd20 to 3174d0d Compare July 15, 2022 14:43
@SethTisue SethTisue self-assigned this Jul 15, 2022
@bjaglin bjaglin marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2022 15:05
@SethTisue SethTisue merged commit a7a85c3 into scala:main Jul 26, 2022
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

thank you!

@SethTisue SethTisue mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants