Skip to content

Conversation

saper
Copy link
Member

@saper saper commented Apr 18, 2016

Well, actually it seems fine. @am11 would be cool if you could have a look at this!

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 78.844% when pulling 8323d7b on saper:msb8012 into dad3022 on sass:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 78.288% when pulling 8323d7b on saper:msb8012 into dad3022 on sass:master.

@am11
Copy link
Contributor

am11 commented Apr 19, 2016

Does renaming TargetPath to SasscPath fix the warning? (i.e. without defining extra variables)

@saper
Copy link
Member Author

saper commented Apr 19, 2016

It might, actually my first thought was that this is just a coincidence...

@xzyfer
Copy link
Contributor

xzyfer commented May 2, 2016

@saper any action to be taken here? Please ship it or close it :)

@xzyfer xzyfer added the Build label May 20, 2016
@xzyfer
Copy link
Contributor

xzyfer commented Feb 19, 2017

VS build files have seen a lot of changes recently. Is this still relevant?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

5 participants