Rollup of 9 pull requests #93734
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #93734
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This should make it substantially less annoying, and hopefully more people will find it useful. In particular, it will no longer run tidy each time you run `git commit --amend` or rebase a branch. This also warns if you have the old script in pre-commit; see the HACK comment for details.
Performing UTF-8 decode outside the JSON module makes more sense in almost all cases.
It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). `const_fn_trait_bounds` weren't mentioned here, so this commit changes its tracking issue to a new one.
Signed-off-by: Inteon <42113979+inteon@users.noreply.github.com>
This should cover a mostly cross-platform subset of supported exit codes.
…strap.py I missed this in rust-lang#89757; it made `x.py test src/bootstrap` very slow.
Previously, rustbuild would give strange errors if you tried to reuse the same build directory under two names: ``` $ mkdir tmp && cd tmp $ ../x.py check Building rustbuild Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 35.27s Checking stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) ^C $ cd .. $ mv tmp/build build $ ./x.py check Building rustbuild Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0 (/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap) Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 11.18s failed to execute command: "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/tmp/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--print" "target-libdir" error: No such file or directory (os error 2) ``` This fixes the error. Reusing the same build directory is useful if you want to test path-things in bootstrap itself, without having to recompile it each time. For good measure, this also reruns the build script when PATH changes.
Make the pre-commit script pre-push instead This should make it substantially less annoying, and hopefully more people will find it useful. In particular, it will no longer run tidy each time you run `git commit --amend` or rebase a branch. This also warns if you have the old script in pre-commit; see the HACK comment for details. r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum`` cc ``@caass``
… r=camelid Suggest 1-tuple parentheses on exprs without existing parens A follow-on from rust-lang#86116, split out from rust-lang#90677. This alters the suggestion to add a trailing comma to create a 1-tuple - previously we would only apply this if the relevant expression was parenthesised. We now make the suggestion regardless of parentheses, which reduces the fragility of the check (w.r.t formatting). e.g. ```rust let a: Option<(i32,)> = Some(3); ``` gets the below suggestion: ```rust let a: Option<(i32,)> = Some((3,)); // ^ ^^ ``` This change also improves the suggestion in other ways, such as by only making the suggestion if the types would match after the suggestion is applied and making the suggestion a multipart suggestion.
Cleanup c_str.rs Some code cleanups in `c_str.rs`. No functional changes. ref: bytecodealliance/rustix#163
Add From<u8> for ExitCode This should cover a mostly cross-platform subset of supported exit codes. We decided to stick with `u8` initially since its the common subset between all platforms that we support (excluding wasm which I think only works with `true` or `false`). Posix is supposed to take i32s, but in practice many unix platforms mask out all but the low 8 bits or in some cases the 8-15th bits. Windows takes a u32 instead of an i32. Bourne-compatible shells also report signals as exitcode 128 + `signal_no`, so there's some ambiguity there when returning exit codes > 127, but it is possible to disambiguate them on the other side so we decided against restricting the possible codes further than to `u8`. ## Related - Detailed analysis of exit code support on various platforms: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/mini-pre-rfc-redesigning-process-exitstatus/5426 - rust-lang#48711 - rust-lang#43301 - https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Termination.2FExit.20Status.20Stabilization
…etup, r=Mark-Simulacrum Fix linking stage1 toolchain in `./x.py setup` Closes [92319](rust-lang#92319) Fix linking stage1 toolchain in `./x.py setup`. I guess this can be considered a follow up to rust-lang#89212 by ```@Sl1mb0.``` We create 2 directories and 1 file that are required by rustup to [link a custom toolchain from path](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/blob/5225e87a5d974ab5f1626bcb2a7b43f76ab883f0/src/toolchain.rs#L479-L497). cc ```@jyn514``` and ```@Mark-Simulacrum``` as they were active in rust-lang#89206
…=bjorn3 Drop json::from_reader Just a small cleanup -- this was essentially unused; the one use site is better suited to reading from &str regardless.
…s-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound` It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, rust-lang#93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds. Fixes rust-lang#93679. ```@rustbot``` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
…rk-Simulacrum Use shallow clones for submodules managed by rustbuild, not just bootstrap.py I missed this in rust-lang#89757; it made `x.py test src/bootstrap` very slow.
…ulacrum Rerun bootstrap's build script when RUSTC changes Previously, rustbuild would give strange errors if you tried to reuse the same build directory under two names: ``` $ mkdir tmp && cd tmp $ ../x.py check Building rustbuild Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 35.27s Checking stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) ^C $ cd .. $ mv tmp/build build $ ./x.py check Building rustbuild Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0 (/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap) Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 11.18s failed to execute command: "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/tmp/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--print" "target-libdir" error: No such file or directory (os error 2) ``` This fixes the error. Reusing the same build directory is useful if you want to test path-related things in bootstrap itself, without having to recompile it each time. For good measure, this also reruns the build script when PATH changes.
rustbot added T-compiler | @bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
| 📌 Commit ae6a34c has been approved by |
bors added the S-waiting-on-bors | ⌛ Testing commit ae6a34c with merge 91f390627c081bf987fe53ac335dbfcb37ea0844... |
| The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
| 💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors added S-waiting-on-review 
| That failure is caused by #93445. Posted a comment there. |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
./x.py setup#93487 (Fix linking stage1 toolchain in./x.py setup)const_fn_trait_bound#93682 (Update tracking issue forconst_fn_trait_bound)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup