Skip to content

Conversation

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Fixes #74711
I do not add the test here since the limit value depends on the machine and it's hard to test the output.
r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 27, 2020
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 27, 2020

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 27, 2020

📌 Commit 00b380b has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 27, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2020
…arth Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#73858 (Make more primitive integer methods const) - rust-lang#74487 (Forbid generic parameters in anon consts inside of type defaults) - rust-lang#74803 (rustbuild: fix bad usage of UNIX exec() in rustc wrapper) - rust-lang#74822 (More ensure stack to avoid segfault with increased `recursion_limit`) Failed merges: r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 539ba96 into rust-lang:master Jul 27, 2020
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the no-sigsegv branch July 27, 2020 19:35
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

5 participants