Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

crazytonyli and others added 8 commits April 4, 2024 19:08
The expected value is "<arch>-apple-watchos<major>.<minor>.0", i.e. "arm64_32-apple-watchos8.0.0". compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/mod.rs contains functions that construct such string. There is an existing function `watchos_sim_llvm_target` which returns llvm target value for watchOS simulator. But there is none for watchOS device. This commit adds that missing function to align watchOS with other Apple platform targets.
Previously we left the panic hook we allocated on main termination. Doing so makes Valgrind report it as a reachable unfreed block. In order to fix that use `panic::take_hook()` before examining test results. Example backtrace: ``` ==146594== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==146594== at 0x4A390C5: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:442) ==146594== by 0x151336: alloc (alloc.rs:98) ==146594== by 0x151336: alloc_impl (alloc.rs:181) ==146594== by 0x151336: allocate (alloc.rs:241) ==146594== by 0x151336: exchange_malloc (alloc.rs:330) ==146594== by 0x151336: new<test::test_main::{closure_env#0}> (boxed.rs:217) ==146594== by 0x151336: test::test_main (lib.rs:124) ==146594== by 0x1522F9: test::test_main_static (lib.rs:160) ==146594== by 0x11E102: reachable_block_with_cargo_test::main (lib.rs:1) ==146594== by 0x11EABA: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once (function.rs:250) ==146594== by 0x11E76D: std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace (backtrace.rs:154) ==146594== by 0x11DFC0: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}} (rt.rs:166) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: call_once<(), (dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (function.rs:284) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panicking.rs:504) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<i32, &(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (panicking.rs:468) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panic.rs:142) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: {closure#2} (rt.rs:148) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panicking.rs:504) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<isize, std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}> (panicking.rs:468) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panic.rs:142) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: std::rt::lang_start_internal (rt.rs:148) ==146594== by 0x11DF99: std::rt::lang_start (rt.rs:165) ``` Signed-off-by: Tal Gelbard <talgelbard1@gmail.com>
…, r=cuviper Drop panic hook after running tests Issue: rust-lang#119223 Previously we left the panic hook we allocated on main termination. Doing so makes Valgrind report it as a reachable unfreed block. In order to fix that use `panic::take_hook()` before examining test results. Example backtrace: ``` ==146594== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 ==146594== at 0x4A390C5: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:442) ==146594== by 0x151336: alloc (alloc.rs:98) ==146594== by 0x151336: alloc_impl (alloc.rs:181) ==146594== by 0x151336: allocate (alloc.rs:241) ==146594== by 0x151336: exchange_malloc (alloc.rs:330) ==146594== by 0x151336: new<test::test_main::{closure_env#0}> (boxed.rs:217) ==146594== by 0x151336: test::test_main (lib.rs:124) ==146594== by 0x1522F9: test::test_main_static (lib.rs:160) ==146594== by 0x11E102: reachable_block_with_cargo_test::main (lib.rs:1) ==146594== by 0x11EABA: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once (function.rs:250) ==146594== by 0x11E76D: std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace (backtrace.rs:154) ==146594== by 0x11DFC0: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}} (rt.rs:166) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: call_once<(), (dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (function.rs:284) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panicking.rs:504) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<i32, &(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe)> (panicking.rs:468) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<&(dyn core::ops::function::Fn<(), Output=i32> + core::marker::Sync + core::panic::unwind_safe::RefUnwindSafe), i32> (panic.rs:142) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: {closure#2} (rt.rs:148) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: do_call<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panicking.rs:504) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: try<isize, std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}> (panicking.rs:468) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: catch_unwind<std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure_env#2}, isize> (panic.rs:142) ==146594== by 0x177D3A: std::rt::lang_start_internal (rt.rs:148) ==146594== by 0x11DF99: std::rt::lang_start (rt.rs:165) ```
Put checks that detect UB under their own flag below debug_assertions Implementation of rust-lang/compiler-team#725
…t, r=estebank Fix incorrect 'llvm_target' value used on watchOS target ## Issue `xcodebuild -create-xcframework` command doesn't recognize static libraries that are built on "arm64_32-apple-watchos" target. Here are steps to reproduce the issue on a Mac: 1. Install nightly toolchain `nightly-2024-03-27`. Needs this specific version, because newer nightly versions are broken on watchos target. 1. Create an empty library: `mkdir watchos-lib && cd watchos-lib && cargo init --lib`. 1. Add configuration `lib.crate-type=["staticlib"]` to Cargo.toml. 1. Build the library: `cargo +nightly-2024-03-27 build --release -Zbuild-std --target arm64_32-apple-watchos` 1. Run `xcodebuild -create-xcframework` to put the static library into a xcframework, which results in an error: ``` $ xcodebuild -create-xcframework -library target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a -output test.xcframework error: unable to determine the platform for the given binary '.../watchos-lib/target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a'; check your deployment version settings ``` ## Fix The root cause of this error is `xcodebuild` couldn't read `LC_BUILD_VERSION` from the static library to determine the library's target platform. And the reason it's missing is that an incorrect `llvm_target` value is used in `arm64_32-apple-watchos` target. The expected value is `<arch>-apple-watchos<major>.<minor>.0`, i.e. "arm64_32-apple-watchos8.0.0". The [.../apple/mod.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/43f4f2a3b1a3d3fb3dbbbe4fde33fb97c780ee98/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/mod.rs#L321) file contains functions that construct such string. There is an existing function `watchos_sim_llvm_target` which returns llvm target value for watchOS simulator. But there is none for watchOS device. This PR adds that missing function to align watchOS with other Apple platform targets. To verify the fix, you can simply build a toolchain on this PR branch and repeat the steps above using the built local toolchain to verify the `xcodebuild -create-xcframework` command can create a xcframework successfully. Furthermore, you can verify `LC_BUILD_VERSION` contains correct info by using the simple shell script below to print `LC_BUILD_VERSION` of the static library that's built on watchos target: ```shell bin=target/arm64_32-apple-watchos/release/libwatchos_lib.a file=$(ar -t "$bin" | grep -E '\.o$' | head -n 1) ar -x "$bin" "$file" vtool -show-build-version "$file" ``` Here is an example output from my machine: ``` watchos_rust-495d6aaf3bccc08d.watchos_rust.35ba42bf9255ca9d-cgu.0.rcgu.o: Load command 1 cmd LC_BUILD_VERSION cmdsize 24 platform WATCHOS minos 8.0 sdk n/a ntools 0 ```
…errors Do not ICE on field access check on expr with `ty::Error` Fix rust-lang#123428
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 6, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

📌 Commit 7aa78df has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 6, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 7aa78df with merge 40bed14...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119224 (Drop panic hook after running tests) - rust-lang#123411 (Put checks that detect UB under their own flag below debug_assertions) - rust-lang#123446 (Fix incorrect 'llvm_target' value used on watchOS target) - rust-lang#123516 (Do not ICE on field access check on expr with `ty::Error`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 6, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
 
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-j3841l4 branch April 7, 2024 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

8 participants