- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead #121899
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+14 −0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @wesleywiser rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
2fe8572
to 71080dd
Compare wesleywiser approved these changes Mar 13, 2024
@bors r+ rollup |
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104353 (Add CStr::bytes iterator) - rust-lang#114038 (unix time module now return result) - rust-lang#119676 (rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions) - rust-lang#120699 (Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.) - rust-lang#121899 (Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead) - rust-lang#121940 (Mention Register Size in `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]`) - rust-lang#122397 (Various cleanups around the const eval query providers) - rust-lang#122405 (Add methods to create StableMIR constant) - rust-lang#122416 (Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`) - rust-lang#122440 (const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts) - rust-lang#122461 (fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
This was referenced Mar 14, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104353 (Add CStr::bytes iterator) - rust-lang#119676 (rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions) - rust-lang#120699 (Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.) - rust-lang#121899 (Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead) - rust-lang#122405 (Add methods to create StableMIR constant) - rust-lang#122416 (Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`) - rust-lang#122421 (Improve `Step` docs) - rust-lang#122440 (const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts) - rust-lang#122461 (fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers) Failed merges: - rust-lang#122397 (Various cleanups around the const eval query providers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121899 - shepmaster:dead-code-docs, r=wesleywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #119645