Refactor: VariantIdx::from_u32(0) -> FIRST_VARIANT #109621
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| r? @oli-obk (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot added S-waiting-on-review 
Since structs are always `VariantIdx(0)`, there's a bunch of files where the only reason they had `VariantIdx` or `vec::Idx` imported at all was to get the first variant. So this uses a constant for that, and adds some doc-comments to `VariantIdx` while I'm there, since it doesn't have any today.
scottmcm force-pushed the update-variantidx branch from 88674f6 to 0439d13 Compare 
| cool beans @bors r+ |
| 🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors added S-waiting-on-bors 
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2023
…iler-errors Refactor: `VariantIdx::from_u32(0)` -> `FIRST_VARIANT` Since structs are always `VariantIdx(0)`, there's a bunch of files where the only reason they had `VariantIdx` or `vec::Idx` imported at all was to get the first variant. So this uses a constant for that, and adds some doc-comments to `VariantIdx` while I'm there, since [it doesn't have any today](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_target/abi/struct.VariantIdx.html).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109007 (rustdoc: skip `// some variants omitted` if enum is `#[non_exhaustive]`) - rust-lang#109593 (Rustdoc Book refer to rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples. Fixes rust-lang#109592.) - rust-lang#109595 (Improve "Auto-hide trait implementation documentation" GUI test) - rust-lang#109619 (Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver) - rust-lang#109620 (Correct typo (`back_box` -> `black_box`)) - rust-lang#109621 (Refactor: `VariantIdx::from_u32(0)` -> `FIRST_VARIANT`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since structs are always
VariantIdx(0), there's a bunch of files where the only reason they hadVariantIdxorvec::Idximported at all was to get the first variant.So this uses a constant for that, and adds some doc-comments to
VariantIdxwhile I'm there, since it doesn't have any today.