Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@notriddle notriddle commented Dec 8, 2022

Preview

http://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/table-2/test_dingus/fn.test.html

Before

image

After

image

Details

* The rule `display: block` had no noticeable effect. Technically, because markdown tables have a tbody and thead, they get wrapped in an [anonymous table box] in the CSS tree, nested within the `<table>` element's block layout box. This rule was added in rust-lang#87230 to make the table side-scrolling, but this same issue was doubly fixed in rust-lang#88742 by wrapping it in an explicit `<div>` tag. Since accessibility advocates recommend the wrapper div over marking the table as `display: block`, we'll stick with that. https://adrianroselli.com/2020/11/under-engineered-responsive-tables.html * The rule `width: calc(100% - 2px)` had no visible effect, because the anonymous table box was not affected. * The style is tweaked to basically be the same style GitHub uses. In particular, it adds zebra stripes, and removes dotted borders. [anonymous table box]: https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/tables.html#anonymous-boxes
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 8, 2022

r? @jsha

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 8, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 8, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS themes.

cc @GuillaumeGomez

A change occurred in the Ayu theme.

cc @Cldfire

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me but let's wait for @jsha to check as well. Please add a rustdoc-gui test for the tables.

@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/docblock-table-css branch from 522a7b0 to 6c5e02a Compare December 8, 2022 17:33
@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/docblock-table-css branch from 6c5e02a to 34700f6 Compare December 8, 2022 17:37
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 8, 2022

📌 Commit 34700f6 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 8, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 441669c into rust-lang:master Dec 9, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Dec 9, 2022
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/docblock-table-css branch December 9, 2022 13:36
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…-css, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS # Preview http://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/table-2/test_dingus/fn.test.html # Before ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/206364287-1b80eaaf-2e0e-4138-8b56-4aa8ff39abac.png) # After ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/206364209-d287d165-31be-4de1-9b43-05b35ce2a86b.png) # Details * The rule `display: block` had no noticeable effect. Technically, because markdown tables have a tbody and thead, they get wrapped in an [anonymous table box] in the CSS tree, nested within the `<table>` element's block layout box. This rule was added in rust-lang#87230 to make the table side-scrolling, but this same issue was doubly fixed in rust-lang#88742 by wrapping it in an explicit `<div>` tag. Since accessibility advocates recommend the wrapper div over marking the table as `display: block`, we'll stick with that. https://adrianroselli.com/2020/11/under-engineered-responsive-tables.html * The rule `width: calc(100% - 2px)` had no visible effect, because the anonymous table box was not affected. * The style is tweaked to basically be the same style GitHub uses. In particular, it adds zebra stripes, and removes dotted borders. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/Markdown.20table.20styling [anonymous table box]: https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/tables.html#anonymous-boxes
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#105216 (Remove unused GUI test) - rust-lang#105245 (attempt to clarify align_to docs) - rust-lang#105387 (Improve Rustdoc scrape-examples UI) - rust-lang#105389 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64le-linux) - rust-lang#105427 (Dont silently ignore rustdoc errors) - rust-lang#105442 (rustdoc: clean up docblock table CSS) - rust-lang#105443 (Move some queries and methods) - rust-lang#105455 (use the correct `Reveal` during validation) - rust-lang#105470 (Clippy: backport ICE fix before beta branch) - rust-lang#105474 (lib docs: fix typo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

5 participants