fix: Validate Error when value undefined

[cactuser-Lu]

fix: ant-design/ant-design#55489

[vercel]

Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the React Component Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @cactuser-Lu, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential runtime error in the validation utility by refining the conditions under which sub-rules are processed. It ensures that array-based sub-rule validation only proceeds if the value being validated is indeed an array and not empty, thereby preventing issues when value might be undefined or of an unexpected type.

Highlights

• Validation Logic: Enhanced the validateRule function to prevent errors when processing sub-rules with undefined or non-array values by adding explicit checks for array type and non-empty status.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request effectively fixes a potential runtime error in the validation logic. When a field with an array-type rule received an undefined or non-array value, the application would crash because it would try to iterate over a non-iterable value. The change introduces a guard to ensure the value is a non-empty array before attempting to validate its items. This is a correct and robust solution to the problem.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.44%. Comparing base (f9ac280) to head (a4749e9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on antd-5.x.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## antd-5.x #765 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 99.44% 99.44% ========================================= Files 18 18 Lines 1257 1257 Branches 315 315 ========================================= Hits 1250 1250 Misses 7 7 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[yoyo837]

https://github.com/react-component/field-form/releases/tag/v2.7.1