Skip to content

Conversation

@kotAPI
Copy link
Collaborator

@kotAPI kotAPI commented Oct 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated workflow for Chromatic Deployment, enhancing the deployment process.
    • Added support for Node.js version 18 in the workflow.
  • Improvements

    • Workflow triggers now only include push events for the main branch, streamlining the deployment process.
    • Full git history is now accessible during deployment.
  • Documentation

    • Comments added to guide users on using Yarn and configuring the CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Chromatic workflow configuration in the GitHub Actions setup. The workflow name has been changed to "Chromatic Deployment," and the triggering conditions have been updated to specify that the workflow runs on push events to the main branch, removing the previous pull request trigger. The job name is now "chromatic-deployment," the checkout action version has been downgraded, Node.js setup has been added, and various comments have been included to guide users on using Yarn and configuring the Chromatic project token.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml - Workflow name changed to "Chromatic Deployment"
- Job name changed to "chromatic-deployment"
- Checkout action version updated from @v4 to @v3
- Added Node.js setup action with version '18' using actions/setup-node@v3
- Chromatic action version updated from @latest to @v1
- Added comments regarding Yarn usage and CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN configuration

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
The Chromatic workflow found a new way.
With a hop and a skip, it’s now deployed,
A joyful update, let’s all be overjoyed!
From push to main, it’s ready to run,
Hopping through branches, oh what fun! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml (2)

19-22: LGTM! Consider using Node.js version notation with patch level.

The Node.js setup is a good addition. For better version control, consider specifying the exact LTS version.

- node-version: '18' # Adjust this to your project's Node.js version + node-version: '18.19.0' # Latest LTS version of Node.js 18

24-31: LGTM! Consider documenting commonly used Chromatic CLI flags.

The configuration is secure and well-structured. The comment about CLI flags could be more helpful if it included commonly used options.

- # Optional: Add any additional Chromatic CLI flags here - # For example: --exit-zero-on-changes + # Optional: Add any additional Chromatic CLI flags here + # Common options: + # --exit-zero-on-changes # Don't fail the build when changes are detected + # --auto-accept-changes # Automatically accept changes in CI + # --skip # Skip Chromatic deployment, e.g., for non-visual changes
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 711ece5 and 97cf39b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/chromatic.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml (2)

1-9: LGTM! Clear workflow name and well-structured triggers.

The workflow name is descriptive, and the trigger configuration properly handles both push and PR events. The added comments about branch name customization are helpful for maintainers.


12-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using the latest checkout action version.

The workflow downgrades actions/checkout from v4 to v3. While v3 is stable, v4 includes performance improvements and bug fixes.

Let's check if there are any known issues with v4 and Chromatic:

Consider updating to v4 if there are no specific compatibility issues:

- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4
✅ Verification successful

Consider keeping actions/checkout@v3 for now

The downgrade to v3 appears intentional as this is a Storybook/Chromatic deployment workflow. Since there's no evidence of incompatibility with v4, but also no clear documentation requiring v4, it's safer to maintain v3 which is known to work reliably with Chromatic deployments. The fetch-depth configuration is correctly set for Chromatic's git history requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash # Search for any discussions or issues about checkout@v4 compatibility gh issue search "chromatic checkout v4" --repo chromaui/chromatic-cli gh issue search "actions/checkout@v4" --repo chromaui/chromatic-cli 

Length of output: 585


Script:

#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to check for any issues or discussions # 1. Check the repository's README or docs for any specific checkout version requirements fd -t f "README.md|CONTRIBUTING.md|docs" -X cat {} 2>/dev/null # 2. Check workflow files for patterns of checkout usage rg "actions/checkout@" -A 2 -B 2 # 3. Check if there are any issue templates or documentation mentioning checkout versions fd "ISSUE_TEMPLATE|PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE" -X cat {} 2>/dev/null 

Length of output: 5246


Script:

#!/bin/bash # Let's check the Chromatic documentation and examples for any specific requirements # 1. Check for any Chromatic configuration files fd "chromatic.config|chromatic.yml|chromatic.yaml" -X cat {} 2>/dev/null # 2. Look for any Chromatic-related comments or configurations in workflow files rg -A 3 -B 3 "chromatic" .github/workflows/ # 3. Check package.json for Chromatic dependencies and scripts fd "package.json" -X cat {} 

Length of output: 6300

projectToken: ${{ secrets.CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN }}
projectToken: ${{ secrets.CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN }}
# Optional: Add any additional Chromatic CLI flags here
# For example: --exit-zero-on-changes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add newline at end of file.

Add a newline character at the end of the file to comply with POSIX standards.

 # Optional: Add any additional Chromatic CLI flags here # For example: --exit-zero-on-changes +
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# For example: --exit-zero-on-changes
# For example: --exit-zero-on-changes
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml (1)

19-22: Consider using a more specific Node.js version.

While Node.js 18 is specified, using a more specific version (e.g., '18.x.x') would ensure consistent builds across environments.

Apply this diff to use a more specific version:

 - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 with: - node-version: '18' # Adjust this to your project's Node.js version + node-version: '18.18.2' # Adjust this to your project's Node.js version
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97cf39b and 48e966c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/chromatic.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/chromatic.yml (4)

1-9: Consider keeping PR triggers for early detection of visual changes.

Removing PR triggers (pull_request event) means visual changes will only be detected after merging to main. This could lead to visual regressions being discovered too late in the development cycle. Consider keeping both push and PR triggers to catch issues during review phase.

Apply this diff to restore PR triggers while keeping the push trigger:

name: 'Chromatic Deployment' on: push: branches: - main # Adjust this if your main branch has a different name - # pull_request: # No need for PRs for now - # branches: - # - main # Adjust this if your main branch has a different name + pull_request: + branches: + - main # Adjust this if your main branch has a different name

28-30: Good use of specific version for Chromatic action.

Using @v1 instead of @latest ensures reproducible builds and prevents unexpected changes.


32-32: Missing newline at end of file.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


15-17: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using the latest checkout action version.

The workflow downgrades actions/checkout from v4 to v3. Unless there's a specific compatibility requirement, it's recommended to use the latest version (v4) to benefit from improvements and security updates.

Apply this diff to use the latest version:

- - uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 # Required for Chromatic to retrieve git history
@kotAPI kotAPI merged commit cb38bd5 into main Oct 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@kotAPI kotAPI deleted the pranay/chromatic-master-deployment branch October 27, 2024 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants