Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jun 17, 2024

Details can be seen in Issue 7177.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 18, 2024

Most of the failure caused by numpy, seem no related about this PR. How can I rerun this PR after the fix of build/test enviroment?

@JackCaoG
Copy link
Collaborator

hmm if you rebase the issue should be gone

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 20, 2024

I think this PR need re-approve to run the tests.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 21, 2024

I can not reproduce the test_train_mp_mnist_amp.py failure in my machine. And it is weird that the training loss has decreased to 0.00066 which is same as I see in my machine but the accuracy is 0. I really don’t know why sdp affects the mnist. It’s obvious that this op is not used at all.

@JackCaoG
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me retrigger, it might be using the fake data so accuracy doesn't matter. It seems like CI just exited with an error code but I don't know why.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 25, 2024

The CI has passed, this PR can be merged.

@JackCaoG JackCaoG merged commit 53c77e2 into pytorch:master Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants