Skip to content

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Sep 3, 2024

  • Final implementation has been merged (including tests and docs)
  • PEP matches the final implementation
  • Any substantial changes since the accepted version approved by the SC/PEP delegate
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark Final)
  • Status changed to Final (and Python-Version is correct)
  • Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
    (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
    or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

Helps #3781.

@markshannon @gaogaotiantian:


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3942.org.readthedocs.build/

@hugovk hugovk requested a review from markshannon as a code owner September 3, 2024 17:52
@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2024
6 tasks
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

ncoghlan commented Sep 4, 2024

#3845 is still open, along with the corresponding SC ticket at python/steering-council#245 so I don't believe it's quite there yet (specifically missing the second point in the checklist).

For the canonical docs, there are a few relevant canonical links:

@hugovk
Copy link
Member Author

hugovk commented Sep 4, 2024

Thanks, let's move this to draft until it's ready.

@hugovk hugovk marked this pull request as draft September 4, 2024 13:06
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

#3845 has been approved and merged, so I think this is genuinely Final now.

@ncoghlan ncoghlan marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2024 17:55
@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 9dca599 into python:main Oct 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep667-mark-as-final branch October 27, 2024 08:27
gvanrossum pushed a commit to gvanrossum/peps that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants