Skip to content

PEP 705: Mark as Final #3938

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
pablogsal merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

PEP 705: Mark as Final #3938

pablogsal merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Sep 3, 2024 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

  • Final implementation has been merged (including tests and docs)
  • PEP matches the final implementation
  • Any substantial changes since the accepted version approved by the SC/PEP delegate
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark Final)
  • Status changed to Final (and Python-Version is correct)
  • Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
    (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
    or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

Helps #3781, cc @alicederyn.

The spec link goes to:

https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spec/typeddict.html#typing-readonly-type-qualifier

Or do we want to link to the header just above it? We'll need to add an extra ref to the spec, if so.

https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spec/typeddict.html#read-only-items

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3938.org.readthedocs.build/
@hugovk hugovk requested a review from pablogsal as a code owner September 3, 2024 15:33
@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2024
Closed
6 tasks
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 818bac5 into python:main Sep 3, 2024
@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep705-mark-as-final branch September 3, 2024 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants

@hugovk @pablogsal