[3.7] bpo-32962: Fix test_gdb failure in debug build with -mcet -fcf-protection -O0 (GH-9656) #9770
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tion -O0 (pythonGH-9656) When Python is built with the intel control-flow protection flags, -mcet -fcf-protection, gdb is not able to read the stack without actually jumping inside the function. This means an extra 'next' command is required to make the $pc (program counter) enter the function and make the stack of the function exposed to gdb. Co-Authored-By: Marcel Plch <gmarcel.plch@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9b7c74c) (cherry picked from commit 79d2133) Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>
Contributor Author
| @vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When Python is built with the intel control-flow protection flags,
-mcet -fcf-protection, gdb is not able to read the stack without
actually jumping inside the function. This means an extra
'next' command is required to make the $pc (program counter)
enter the function and make the stack of the function exposed to gdb.
Co-Authored-By: Marcel Plch gmarcel.plch@gmail.com
(cherry picked from commit 9b7c74c)
(cherry picked from commit 79d2133)
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner vstinner@redhat.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue32962