Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 3, 2018

Previously the module name was used, which broke relative imports when pdb was run against a plain module or submodule.
(cherry picked from commit 38bfa84)

Co-authored-by: Mario Corchero mariocj89@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue32691

…H-5474) Previously the module name was used, which broke relative imports when pdb was run against a plain module or submodule. (cherry picked from commit 38bfa84) Co-authored-by: Mario Corchero <mariocj89@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariocj89 and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mariocj89 and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 1a0239e into python:3.7 Feb 4, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @ncoghlan!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-38bfa84-3.7 branch February 4, 2018 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants