Skip to content

Conversation

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Oct 15, 2021

Move the interpreteridobject.h header file from Include/ to
Include/internal/. It only provides private functions.

https://bugs.python.org/issue35081

Move the interpreteridobject.h header file from Include/ to Include/internal/. It only provides private functions.
@vstinner vstinner merged commit 063abd9 into python:main Oct 15, 2021
@vstinner vstinner deleted the interpreteridobject_h branch October 15, 2021 09:56
ShivnarenSrinivasan pushed a commit to ShivnarenSrinivasan/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2021
…28969) Move the interpreteridobject.h header file from Include/ to Include/internal/. It only provides private functions.
ericsnowcurrently added a commit to ericsnowcurrently/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2023
ericsnowcurrently added a commit to ericsnowcurrently/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
ericsnowcurrently added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
…-105258) The _xxsubinterpreters module was meant to only use public API. Some internal C-API usage snuck in over the last few years (e.g. gh-28969). This fixes that.
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
…le (pythongh-105258) The _xxsubinterpreters module was meant to only use public API. Some internal C-API usage snuck in over the last few years (e.g. pythongh-28969). This fixes that. (cherry picked from commit e6373c0) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
ericsnowcurrently added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
…ule (gh-105258) (gh-107303) The _xxsubinterpreters module was meant to only use public API. Some internal C-API usage snuck in over the last few years (e.g. gh-28969). This fixes that. (cherry picked from commit e6373c0) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants