Skip to content

Conversation

@OddBloke
Copy link
Contributor

@OddBloke OddBloke commented Jul 25, 2017

This addresses the documentation of the issue described in bpo-31040,
but not the underlying issue.

https://bugs.python.org/issue31040

This addresses the documentation of the issue described in bpo-31040, but not the underlying issue.
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@OddBloke OddBloke changed the title Add warning note about mimetypes.add_type ext argument format bpo-31040: Add warning note about mimetypes.add_type ext argument format Jul 25, 2017
@OddBloke
Copy link
Contributor Author

(I signed the CLA just before submitting this PR, so that should be cleared up fairly soon.)

@matrixise matrixise added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label May 15, 2019

.. note::

The *ext* argument should start with a dot ("``.``") for the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also explicitly tell it can be empty, see b.p.o.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@OddBloke, please address the code review comments from @JulienPalard. Thanks!

@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@OddBloke ping

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Feb 20, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2022 03:49
@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

JelleZijlstra commented May 8, 2022

Closing as it's been almost three years since the requested change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting changes docs Documentation in the Doc dir stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

9 participants