[3.13] gh-119560: Drop an Invalid Assert in PyState_FindModule() (gh-119561) #119632
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ongh-119561) The assertion was added in pythongh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that PyState_FindModule() would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again. (cherry picked from commit 0c5ebe1) Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
miss-islington requested review from brettcannon, ericsnowcurrently, kumaraditya303, ncoghlan and warsaw as code owners 
This was referenced May 27, 2024
ericsnowcurrently removed request for brettcannon, kumaraditya303, ncoghlan and warsaw 
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The assertion was added in gh-118532 but was based on the invalid assumption that PyState_FindModule() would only be called with an already-initialized module def. I've added a test to make sure we don't make that assumption again.
(cherry picked from commit 0c5ebe1)
Co-authored-by: Eric Snow ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com