Skip to content

bpo-35081: Move _PyGC_FINALIZED() back to C API #10626

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2018
Merged

bpo-35081: Move _PyGC_FINALIZED() back to C API #10626

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2018

Conversation

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Nov 20, 2018 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Partially revert commit 1a6be91,
move back PyGC API from the internal API to the C API:

  • _PyGCHead_NEXT(g), _PyGCHead_SET_NEXT(g, p)
  • _PyGCHead_PREV(g), _PyGCHead_SET_PREV(g, p)
  • _PyGCHead_FINALIZED(g), _PyGCHead_SET_FINALIZED(g)
  • _PyGC_FINALIZED(o), _PyGC_SET_FINALIZED(o)
  • _PyGC_PREV_MASK_FINALIZED
  • _PyGC_PREV_MASK_COLLECTING
  • _PyGC_PREV_SHIFT
  • _PyGC_PREV_MASK

_PyObject_GC_TRACK(o) and _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK(o) remain in the
internal API.

https://bugs.python.org/issue35081
@vstinner
bpo-35081: Move _PyGC_FINALIZED() back to C API
692b73c 
Partially revert commit 1a6be91, move back PyGC API from the internal API to the C API: * _PyGCHead_NEXT(g), _PyGCHead_SET_NEXT(g, p) * _PyGCHead_PREV(g), _PyGCHead_SET_PREV(g, p) * _PyGCHead_FINALIZED(g), _PyGCHead_SET_FINALIZED(g) * _PyGC_FINALIZED(o), _PyGC_SET_FINALIZED(o) * _PyGC_PREV_MASK_FINALIZED * _PyGC_PREV_MASK_COLLECTING * _PyGC_PREV_SHIFT * _PyGC_PREV_MASK _PyObject_GC_TRACK(o) and _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK(o) remain in the internal API.
@vstinner vstinner merged commit 3e21ad1 into python:master Nov 20, 2018
@vstinner vstinner deleted the _PyGC_FINALIZED branch November 20, 2018 23:43
This was referenced Nov 20, 2018
Merged
Closed
@AvdN
Copy link

AvdN commented Dec 12, 2018 •
edited
Loading

This fixed an issue with the C based loader for YAML in ruamel.yaml as well (which is Cython based).
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

vstinner commented Dec 12, 2018

This fixed an issue with the C based loaded for YAML in ruamel.yaml as well (which is Cython based).

Oh, good to know. Thanks ;-)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip news

4 participants

@vstinner @AvdN @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot