Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated several environment dependencies, including upgrading executorlib to version 1.6.0, numpy to 2.3.1, and mpi4py to 4.1.0.
    • Specified that the lammps package must be built with MPI support using OpenMPI.
    • No changes to application features or user-facing functionality.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This update raises the version of the executorlib dependency across multiple environment configuration files and the project’s pyproject.toml, with some additional version bumps for numpy and mpi4py in the Binder environment. No code or public API changes are included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.ci_support/environment-mpich.yml,
.ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml,
pyproject.toml
Updated executorlib version from 1.5.3 to 1.6.0
binder/environment.yml Updated numpy (2.0.2 → 2.3.1), mpi4py (4.0.1 → 4.1.0), executorlib (0.0.4 → 1.6.0), and added build constraint to lammps

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

dependencies

Poem

A hop and a skip, dependencies grow,
Executorlib’s numbers now higher they go!
Numpy and friends, with versions anew,
The rabbit ensures the environment’s true.
With every small change, the garden’s in sync—
🐇 Cheers to the code, in harmony’s pink!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

26-30: Pin build-time requirement or loosen runtime pin for executorlib.

Runtime dependency is now executorlib==1.6.0, but [build-system].requires still lists an unpinned executorlib.
If the project actually needs executorlib during build, mismatched versions could slip in when 1.7+ appears.

Options:

-requires = ["mpi4py", "numpy", "executorlib", "setuptools", "versioneer[toml]==0.29"] +requires = ["mpi4py", "numpy", "executorlib==1.6.0", "setuptools", "versioneer[toml]==0.29"]

—or—relax the runtime spec to executorlib>=1.6,<2 for a single source of truth.

Please verify the intended constraint strategy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc18899 and e39a4cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml (1 hunks)
  • .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml (1 hunks)
  • binder/environment.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.ci_support/environment-mpich.yml (1)

9-9: Version bump looks consistent – no further action needed.

executorlib is now aligned with the other environment files and pyproject.toml.
No breaking changes expected.

.ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml (1)

9-9: Dependency pin aligned across configs – LGTM.

executorlib =1.6.0 matches the MPICH config and project metadata, ensuring consistency.

binder/environment.yml (1)

4-8: Double-check availability of pinned versions in the Binder image.

numpy =2.3.1 and lammps =2024.08.29=*_mpi_openmpi_* are very new; wheels/conda builds may not yet be published on conda-forge at Binder build time.
openmpi is unpinned here while other CI envs pin openmpi =5.0.8. Mixed MPI stacks can break runtime compatibility.

Consider:

- openmpi + openmpi =5.0.8

and verify that all pinned versions exist on conda-forge.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen reopened this Jul 17, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.02%. Comparing base (79e1ea5) to head (e39a4cc).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #342 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 81.02% 81.02% ======================================= Files 5 5 Lines 548 548 ======================================= Hits 444 444 Misses 104 104 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 0f584d4 into main Jul 17, 2025
25 of 33 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the exe branch July 17, 2025 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants