Skip to content

Conversation

@cwhanse
Copy link
Member

@cwhanse cwhanse commented Apr 16, 2024

  • Closes Update Comparison with PVLIB MATLAB #2010
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • [ ] Tests added
  • [ ] Updates entries in docs/sphinx/source/reference for API changes.
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • [ ] New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels (including remote-data) and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

Deletes "comparison with Matlab page" from user guide, and makes minor edits elsewhere in document pages.

@AdamRJensen
Copy link
Member

Maybe also delete this reference to matlab:

uses absolute airmass. PVLib Matlab also uses the absolute airmass.

@cwhanse
Copy link
Member Author

cwhanse commented Apr 16, 2024

Maybe also delete this reference to matlab:

uses absolute airmass. PVLib Matlab also uses the absolute airmass.

I would leave that mention in the docstring, since we're explaining why the code deviates from the first reference. We spent a lot of time resolving these kind of discrepancies when we put the Matlab toolbox together.

@cwhanse cwhanse added this to the v0.10.5 milestone Apr 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: Kevin Anderson <kevin.anderso@gmail.com>
@kandersolar kandersolar merged commit 3b3a38a into pvlib:main Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

3 participants