Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about exporting
useAff'
to allow a user to define custom hooks built on top of it? Contrived example, but I could imagine maybe wanting to pass something other thanidentity
orconst Nothing
as theinitUpdater
if wanting to track loading state along with theAff
's result (to preserve and render the previous result but disable a button while some request is in flight, e.g.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd want to have a pretty convincing use case. It's easy enough to copy/paste for current edge cases, so I worry it's not worth exposing that complexity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But happy to defer to others since I'm not an active user right now.
Same goes for merging/publishing this.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keeping the external API simple makes sense to me 👍 In cases where I've wanted anything other than the
Maybe a
state thatuseAff
returns I'd just use a separateuseState
and useuseAff
for scheduling. So for the snippet I had above I think I'd probably just dowhich is not much more complicated than the version using
useAff'
.I'm not really an active user either aside from side projects. Lumi's use case for
useSteppingAff
seems like enough motivation for merging this as-is, but I'll leave this open for feedback for a couple more days before merging.