use matching backticks in docstrings. #481
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Thank you for this! I'll merge it ASAP. It makes sense to fix it here. Don't hesitate to create pull requests for stuff like this. |
| Merged in 021e6cc + also pushed to the 2.0 branch. Thanks! |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We autogenerate a shortcut list in IPython docs using docstrings, the non-matching backticks make RST to complain.
We could fix it, but it seem cleaner to do it upstream :-)