- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
feat(Audience Evaluation): Audience Logging #152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
30 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
001593f feat (audience match types): Update condition evaluator for new audie…
rashidsp 0412be0 adds absolute limit
rashidsp 80569a1 feat (audience match types): Update audience evaluator and project co…
rashidsp ad7e32b feat (audience match types): Update condition evaluator for new audie…
rashidsp 8363bbf feat(audience-match-types): Update audience evaluator and project con…
rashidsp 3990bf1 feat(attribute_value): Don't target NAN, INF, -INF and > 2^53 (#148)
rashidsp 0c6c795 feat(audiences): Audience combinations (#147)
rashidsp 8d2b3ee resolves conflicts
rashidsp 9291b97 Updates header and resolves conflicts
rashidsp f5b37b2 nit: header update
rashidsp 58330b3 Merge branch 'master' into rashid/audience-match-types
rashidsp 8453091 fix: travis bundler issue
rashidsp 37872e6 Merge branch 'master' into rashid/audience-match-types
rashidsp fabf023 feat(Audience Evaluation): Audience Logging
rashidsp 4d9ad8f Merge branch 'master' into rashid/audience-match-types
rashidsp e438ad2 Merge branch 'rashid/audience-match-types' into rashid/logging-for-au…
rashidsp 0238950 addresses comments
rashidsp 479bc84 Fix: user attribute check
rashidsp b591d49 Merge branch 'master' into rashid/logging-for-audience
rashidsp 527d699 revises logging improvements
rashidsp 0b7958e Merge branch 'master' into rashid/logging-for-audience
rashidsp ad7745d Updated according to doc
rashidsp 7234863 Merge branch 'rashid/logging-for-audience' of github.com:optimizely/r…
rashidsp 5468d37 Fix: return str bug.
rashidsp eb9770b refact: new recommendations.
rashidsp 455a697 refact: separated finite_number condition
rashidsp 89184d7 Addressing feedback
rashidsp 006dd0f few minor updates
rashidsp 8986472 Addressing feedback
rashidsp 30d9330 review changes
rashidsp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
refact: separated finite_number condition
- Loading branch information
commit 455a69797b369122e6cf28d03706f14c736d6eea
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: would be slightly better (and certainly more consistent with other SDKs) to reorder the above two blocks. If the
condition_valueisn't a string, that'd be indicative of a broader problem that might be resolved in a future SDK, where it might actually be legitimate for theuser_provided_valueto be a non-string.(I know we check for non-nil
user_provided_valuebefore we get to either of these blocks, but at least that helps us increase code re-use...)