Skip to content

Conversation

junaed-optimizely
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Test coverage report job added

Test plan

Existing test should pass

Issues

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Code Coverage Report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 98.95% 847/856
🟢 Branches 91.64% 340/371
🟢 Functions 97.52% 157/161
🟢 Lines 99.09% 765/772

Test suite run success

258 tests passing in 10 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 29f939a

@junaed-optimizely junaed-optimizely marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2024 13:09
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Jest Coverage Report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 98.95% 847/856
🟢 Branches 91.64% 340/371
🟢 Functions 97.52% 157/161
🟢 Lines 99.09% 765/772

Test suite run success

258 tests passing in 10 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 6fed881

Copy link
Contributor

@mikechu-optimizely mikechu-optimizely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. 👍

ArtiomTr/jest-coverage-report-action looks like a good and active project.

Part of me wishes we could collect the --coverage only on the last matrix run (20; currently), then if 1 additional step to unitTests to publish the report. ...but then I'm just over-engineering for the sake of a 1 additional run.

@junaed-optimizely junaed-optimizely merged commit 80e4d2c into master Sep 10, 2024
12 checks passed
@junaed-optimizely junaed-optimizely deleted the junaed/fssdk-10437-enable-coverage-report branch September 10, 2024 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants