Skip to content

Conversation

trask
Copy link
Member

@trask trask commented Sep 2, 2025

Related

Pros:

  • Value maps are more performant than in Prototype: Complex attributes (Option B) #7661
  • Reuses existing (and familiar) Attributes
  • Only exposes less performant and more complex Value API for heterogeneous maps, which are not expected to be common

Cons:

  • Mixes concept of attributes and nested maps
@trask trask force-pushed the complex-attrs branch 5 times, most recently from 1a6d02e to f66919d Compare September 16, 2025 19:08
@trask trask changed the title Prototype: Complex attributes Prototype: Complex attributes (Option A) Sep 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant