fs: remove redundant nullCheck #48826
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot added fs 
github-actions bot removed the request-ci 
Collaborator
lpinca approved these changes Jul 18, 2023
VoltrexKeyva approved these changes Jul 18, 2023
Collaborator
25 tasks
anonrig approved these changes Jul 19, 2023
anonrig added author ready 22 tasks
nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Collaborator
| Landed in e7c3977 |
This was referenced Jul 21, 2023
pluris pushed a commit to pluris/node that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
pluris pushed a commit to pluris/node that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit to UlisesGascon/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
PR-URL: #48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Merged
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
PR-URL: #48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs/node#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs/node#48826 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
basePathis validated withgetValidatedPathbefore callingreaddirSyncRecursiveso there's no need to doublecheck it.The check might make sense for each iteration, but AFAIK there's no way to stumble upon dirent with NUL character in its name.