-
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
crypto: check return code from EVP_DigestUpdate #41800
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>
Collaborator
| Review requested:
|
Member Author
| In case anybody is interested this is the other place we call EVP_DigestUpdate - Line 316 in 0ff62b4
|
tniessen approved these changes Jan 31, 2022
tniessen approved these changes Jan 31, 2022
Co-authored-by: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
cjihrig approved these changes Feb 1, 2022
lpinca approved these changes Feb 1, 2022
panva approved these changes Feb 1, 2022
Collaborator
Collaborator
41 tasks
Member Author
| Landed in 674a955 |
mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
VoltrexKeyva pushed a commit to VoltrexKeyva/node that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
This was referenced Feb 4, 2022
ruyadorno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit to danielleadams/node that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit to danielleadams/node that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: nodejs#41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the return code. We seem to check in the other place it is called and the method already handles returning a result. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com> PR-URL: #41800 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coverity was complaining that we did not check the
return code. We seem to check in the other place it
is called and the method already handles returning
a result.
Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson mdawson@devrus.com