Skip to content

Conversation

@dnlup
Copy link
Contributor

@dnlup dnlup commented Mar 20, 2019

Use require('internal/util/inspect').format instead of
require('util').format.

Refs: #26546

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Use `require('internal/util/inspect').format` instead of `require('util').format`. Refs: nodejs#26546
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. label Mar 20, 2019
}
} = require('internal/errors');
const util = require('util');
const format = require('internal/util/inspect').format;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const format = require('internal/util/inspect').format;
const { format } = require('internal/util/inspect');
@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 22, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2019
Use `require('internal/util/inspect').format` instead of `require('util').format`. PR-URL: nodejs#26817 Refs: nodejs#26546 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in 4a07a62 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Mar 24, 2019
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
Use `require('internal/util/inspect').format` instead of `require('util').format`. PR-URL: nodejs#26817 Refs: nodejs#26546 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
Use `require('internal/util/inspect').format` instead of `require('util').format`. PR-URL: #26817 Refs: #26546 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@dnlup dnlup deleted the util_process branch January 10, 2020 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.

5 participants