Skip to content

Conversation

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax commented Jan 9, 2019

This is functionally the same as #25361, but with some extra tricks that avoid backporting pain for v11.x.

The first commit sets the default for --experimental-worker to true. Since there is no way to turn the flag off at this point, it means that Workers are always enabled.

The second commit cherry-picks the parts of #25361 that do not lead to merge conflicts on v11.x. The remainder of #25361 can be backported once a few older PRs have been backported to v11.x. All changes in this second commit have already been reviewed and approved.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
This is similar to nodejs#25361 in functionality, but allows avoiding some backporting pain for v11.x. Refs: nodejs#25361
This is a trimmed-down version of 63d4cae that avoids backporting pain for v11.x. The remainder of the original commit can be cherry-picked later, once other PRs have been backported first. --- Having an experimental feature behind a flag makes change if we are expecting significant breaking changes to its API. Since the Worker API has been essentially stable since its initial introduction, and no noticeable doubt about possibly not keeping the feature around has been voiced, removing the flag and thereby reducing the barrier to experimentation, and consequently receiving feedback on the implementation, seems like a good idea. Refs: nodejs#25361 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
@addaleax addaleax added the worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support. label Jan 9, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. v11.x labels Jan 9, 2019
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 9, 2019

Landed in d17ea0df994a49adcec4ef1e0bba471c8c5569b3 and c0276c0bd0aeffaad25903ec191f844c1fdcbd8a 🎉
Landed in 7bb7b9a and 65c136f 🎉 (due to a former commit this caused a test failure).

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Jan 9, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2019
This is similar to #25361 in functionality, but allows avoiding some backporting pain for v11.x. PR-URL: #25404 Refs: #25361 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2019
This is a trimmed-down version of 63d4cae that avoids backporting pain for v11.x. The remainder of the original commit can be cherry-picked later, once other PRs have been backported first. PR-URL: #25404 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> --- Original commit message --- Having an experimental feature behind a flag makes change if we are expecting significant breaking changes to its API. Since the Worker API has been essentially stable since its initial introduction, and no noticeable doubt about possibly not keeping the feature around has been voiced, removing the flag and thereby reducing the barrier to experimentation, and consequently receiving feedback on the implementation, seems like a good idea. Refs: #25361 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
@addaleax addaleax deleted the workers-default branch January 10, 2019 11:08
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
This is similar to nodejs#25361 in functionality, but allows avoiding some backporting pain for v11.x. PR-URL: nodejs#25404 Refs: nodejs#25361 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
This is a trimmed-down version of 63d4cae that avoids backporting pain for v11.x. The remainder of the original commit can be cherry-picked later, once other PRs have been backported first. PR-URL: nodejs#25404 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> --- Original commit message --- Having an experimental feature behind a flag makes change if we are expecting significant breaking changes to its API. Since the Worker API has been essentially stable since its initial introduction, and no noticeable doubt about possibly not keeping the feature around has been voiced, removing the flag and thereby reducing the barrier to experimentation, and consequently receiving feedback on the implementation, seems like a good idea. Refs: nodejs#25361 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support.

3 participants