-
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
async_hooks: use CHECK instead of throwing error #17832
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. addaleax approved these changes Dec 23, 2017
apapirovski approved these changes Dec 23, 2017
cjihrig approved these changes Dec 23, 2017
Contributor Author
gireeshpunathil approved these changes Dec 23, 2017
lpinca approved these changes Dec 23, 2017
Contributor Author
| Landing... |
Contributor Author
| Landed in 81c2b59 |
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. PR-URL: #17832 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. PR-URL: #17832 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. PR-URL: #17832 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Merged
This was referenced Jan 16, 2018
gibfahn pushed a commit to gibfahn/node that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2018
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. PR-URL: nodejs#17832 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#18179 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2018
SetupHooks is only available via `process.binding('async_wrap')`, so there's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments, since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is used is `lib/internal/async_hooks.js`. Backport-PR-URL: #18179 PR-URL: #17832 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SetupHooks is only available via
process.binding('async_wrap'), sothere's no reason it shouldn't be called with the appropriate arguments,
since it is an internal-only function. The only place this function is
used is
lib/internal/async_hooks.js.cc @jasnell
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
async_hooks