-
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
fix: use StrEnum #164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: use StrEnum #164
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- enums/User.py (1 hunks)
- tests/conftest.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
enums/User.py (1)
4-8: Approved: Transition to StrEnum with auto().The transition from
EnumtoStrEnumenhances type safety and usability. The use ofauto()for enumeration values is correctly implemented and simplifies the code by automatically deriving string values from member names.tests/conftest.py (1)
79-79: Verify the new cookie value assignment.The change to directly assign
request.paramto the cookie value simplifies the code. However, it is crucial to verify thatrequest.paramcontains the correct data format and value expected by the session management system.Run the following script to verify the correctness of the cookie value assignment:
Verification successful
Verification successful: Cookie value assignment is appropriate.
The direct assignment of
request.paramto the cookie value in thebrowser_context_argsfunction is consistent with its usage in the test files. The parameterization with user roles suggests thatrequest.paramis being used correctly, and the change should not affect the functionality of the session management. No issues were found with this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the cookie value assignment. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'browser_context_args'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the cookie value assignment. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'browser_context_args'Length of output: 2930
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes