Skip to content

Conversation

gigamaax
Copy link
Contributor

@gigamaax gigamaax commented Mar 31, 2025

I made another change that I'm worried might not be the right direction:

Here
https://github.com/neovim/go-client/pull/184/files#diff-4686cdf50ccf547850a2e89191f11c343519caef6fd7718fd73b7a1480606bd0L3843

I moved away from using the color map based on https://neovim.io/doc/user/syntax.html#ctermbg. I'm not sure if the ctermbg / ctermfg are expected to work with the RGB colors that are in the color map, or if maybe the color map has been enhanced since v0.9? I'm not sure if I'm avoiding the issue with this fix.

gigamaax and others added 5 commits March 29, 2025 16:15
for nvim minor verion 9, no commands are returned for nvim minor version 10, three are returned currently, for nightly builds, four are returend
neovim ships with default keybindings that may change per verison. the tests, prior to this change, included these default key mappings which make the tests fragile with each release. keeping a list of default commands should be outside the scope of this library. this change removes assertions against the entire set of keymaps returned by `nvim_get_keymap` and only verifies the desired keymap has been added and then removed.
using the colors described here rather than the color map https://neovim.io/doc/user/syntax.html#ctermbg
v0.11 changed the way that messages are broadcast from only to those who are subscribed, to all channels. this test, as it's written, doesn't make sense in that scenario. snippet from release notes: > vim.rpcnotify(0) and rpcnotify(0) broadcast to ALL channels. Previously > they would "multicast" only to subscribed channels (controlled by > nvim_subscribe()). Plugins and clients that want "multicast" behavior > must now maintain their own list of channels.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.1%. Comparing base (dd77a91) to head (af022d4).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #184 +/- ## ======================================= - Coverage 83.3% 83.1% -0.2%  ======================================= Files 14 14 Lines 3132 3134 +2 ======================================= - Hits 2610 2607 -3  - Misses 522 527 +5 
Flag Coverage Δ
linux-1.18-nightly ?
linux-1.18-stable ?
linux-1.19-nightly ?
linux-1.19-stable ?
linux-1.20-nightly ?
linux-1.20-stable ?
linux-1.22-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
linux-1.22-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
linux-1.23-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
linux-1.23-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
linux-1.24-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
linux-1.24-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.18-nightly ?
macos-1.18-stable ?
macos-1.19-nightly ?
macos-1.19-stable ?
macos-1.20-nightly ?
macos-1.20-stable ?
macos-1.22-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.22-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.23-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.23-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.24-nightly 82.8% <100.0%> (?)
macos-1.24-stable 83.1% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.18-nightly ?
windows-1.18-stable ?
windows-1.19-nightly ?
windows-1.19-stable ?
windows-1.20-nightly ?
windows-1.20-stable ?
windows-1.22-nightly 82.0% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.22-stable 82.3% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.23-nightly 82.0% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.23-stable 82.3% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.24-nightly 82.0% <100.0%> (?)
windows-1.24-stable 82.3% <100.0%> (?)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
gigamaax and others added 4 commits March 30, 2025 20:25
@gigamaax gigamaax marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 17:36
@justinmk
Copy link
Member

justinmk commented Apr 1, 2025

@zchee zchee self-requested a review April 1, 2025 18:20
@gigamaax gigamaax mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment