Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Mar 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the configuration for our internal code quality analysis tool to use a new version source, ensuring continued streamlined quality checks.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The change updates the GitHub workflow for Codacy Analysis by modifying the version reference of the Codacy Analysis CLI action. The previous version tag (v4) is replaced with the master branch, thereby changing the source used during analysis execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/codacy.yml Updated Codacy Analysis CLI action reference from v4 to master.

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (f082ddf) 272 260 95.59%
Head commit (f2f8236) 272 (+0) 260 (+0) 95.59% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#310) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.88%. Comparing base (f082ddf) to head (f2f8236).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #310 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 88.88% 88.88% ======================================= Files 2 2 Lines 108 108 ======================================= Hits 96 96 Misses 12 12 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/codacy.yml (1)

37-37: Review the Action Version Pinning

The Codacy Analysis CLI action reference has been updated from v4 to master. While this change ensures you always use the latest code from the master branch, it may also expose the workflow to unexpected breaking changes as new commits are merged. If stability is a priority, consider pinning to a specific release tag instead.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8818b87 and 2bfbf14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/codacy.yml (1 hunks)
@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit 3996a95 into master Mar 13, 2025
17 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/codacy-analysis-cli-action branch March 13, 2025 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants