chore(deps): bump pytest from 8.3.4 to 8.3.5

[dependabot]

Bumps pytest from 8.3.4 to 8.3.5.

Release notes

Sourced from pytest's releases.

8.3.5

pytest 8.3.5 (2025-03-02)

Bug fixes

• #11777: Fixed issue where sequences were still being shortened even with -vv verbosity.
• #12888: Fixed broken input when using Python 3.13+ and a libedit build of Python, such as on macOS or with uv-managed Python binaries from the python-build-standalone project. This could manifest e.g. by a broken prompt when using Pdb, or seeing empty inputs with manual usage of input() and suspended capturing.
• #13026: Fixed AttributeError{.interpreted-text role="class"} crash when using --import-mode=importlib when top-level directory same name as another module of the standard library.
• #13053: Fixed a regression in pytest 8.3.4 where, when using --import-mode=importlib, a directory containing py file with the same name would cause an ImportError
• #13083: Fixed issue where pytest could crash if one of the collected directories got removed during collection.

Improved documentation

• #12842: Added dedicated page about using types with pytest.

  See types{.interpreted-text role="ref"} for detailed usage.

Contributor-facing changes

• #13112: Fixed selftest failures in test_terminal.py with Pygments >= 2.19.0
• #13256: Support for Towncrier versions released in 2024 has been re-enabled when building Sphinx docs -- by webknjaz{.interpreted-text role="user"}.

Commits

• b55ab2a Prepare release version 8.3.5
• e217726 Added dedicated page about using types with pytest #12842 (#12963) (#13260)
• 2fa3f83 Add more resources and studies to flaky tests page in docs (#13250) (#13259)
• e5c2efe Merge pull request #13256 from webknjaz/maintenance/towncrier-bump (#13258)
• 3419674 Merge pull request #13187 from pytest-dev/patchback/backports/8.3.x/b4009b319...
• b75cfb1 Add readline workaround for libedit (#13176)
• edbfff7 doc: Clarify capturing .readouterr() return value (#13222) (#13225)
• 2ebba00 Merge pull request #13199 from jakkdl/tox_docs_no_fetch (#13200)
• eb6496b doc: Change training to remote only (#13196) (#13197)
• 78cf1f6 ci: Bump build-and-inspect-python-package (#13188)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (729ecec)	272	260	95.59%
Head commit (2c362ca)	272 (+0)	260 (+0)	95.59% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#307)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.88%. Comparing base (729ecec) to head (2c362ca).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #307 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 88.88% 88.88% ======================================= Files 2 2 Lines 108 108 ======================================= Hits 96 96 Misses 12 12 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.