Skip to content

feature: Support JDK21 (and drop JDK7 support) #765

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
xerial merged 4 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023
Merged

feature: Support JDK21 (and drop JDK7 support) #765

xerial merged 4 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023

Conversation

@xerial
Copy link
Member

@xerial xerial commented Sep 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This also drops JDK7 support.

An error:

Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: java.nio.MemoryBlock	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)	at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)	at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:421)	at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:412)	at org.msgpack.core.buffer.DirectBufferAccess.<clinit>(DirectBufferAccess.java:84)

Related: Remove private DirectByteBuffer(long, int) constructor before JDK 21 GA https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303083. In JDK21, DirectByteBuffer(long, long) constructor can be used.
@xerial xerial changed the title feature: Support JDK21 feature: Support JDK21 (and drop JDK7 support) Sep 24, 2023
@xerial xerial merged commit ba1beab into main Sep 24, 2023
@xerial xerial deleted the jdk21 branch September 24, 2023 03:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking feature

2 participants

@xerial