Fix session service validator coroutine handling

[matdev83]

Summary

• allow TestServiceValidator.validate_session_service to handle coroutine-based get_session implementations while preserving AsyncMock safeguards
• update the validator test suite to assert the coroutine-friendly behavior

Testing

• python -m pytest --override-ini=addopts="" tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py
• python -m pytest --override-ini=addopts="" (fails: missing pytest_asyncio, respx, pytest_httpx, hypothesis dependencies in the environment)

---

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68ec26ffb7448333ace9a74c4ba180a1

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Correctly handles async get_session implementations without raising erroneous TypeErrors.
  • Adds guarded close() handling for awaitable results with debug logging on failures.
  • Provides clearer, more accurate error messages for mismatched async/sync implementations.
• Refactor
  • Centralized coroutine detection and validation for session services to improve reliability.
• Tests
  • Updated unit tests to validate proper coroutine behavior and remove outdated TypeError expectations.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adjusts session service validation to support coroutine-based get_session methods using an is_coroutine flag, centralizes mismatch TypeError raising, and adds guarded close() on awaitable results with debug logging on failure. Updates unit tests to reflect acceptance of proper async implementations and removes previous expectation of TypeError for coroutines.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Session service validation logic src/core/testing/interfaces.py	Replaces immediate TypeError on coroutine detection with is_coroutine flag; validates sync/async consistency; awaits awaitables when appropriate; attempts non-fatal close() with debug log on failure; updates error messages; retains overall validation flow.
Unit tests update tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py	Renames test to use good_get_session; asserts no exception for proper async function; updates docstring to reflect valid coroutine handling; removes prior TypeError expectation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram autonumber participant V as Validator participant S as SessionService participant R as Result Note over V: Validation entry V->>S: get_session(...) alt Method is async (is_coroutine=true) S-->>V: Awaitable V->>R: await result Note over V,R: Centralized handling else Method is sync (is_coroutine=false) S-->>V: Value or Awaitable alt Got Awaitable but method not async V-->>V: Raise TypeError (mismatch) else Got Value Note over V: Proceed end end rect rgba(200, 230, 255, 0.2) Note over V,R: Best-effort cleanup V->>R: try result.close() R-->>V: may fail Note over V: On failure: debug log, continue end 

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

I nudge the tests with a whisker’s grace,
Async burrows now have rightful place.
If close() trips, I won’t make a fuss—
just log a squeak, then hop along the bus.
Flags set straight, no mismatch fright,
Carrots for code that handles day and night. 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly describes the primary change—improving coroutine handling in the session service validator—and directly reflects the modifications in both the validator and its tests without extraneous detail.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 80.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/fix-identified-bug-in-files-i-k-078mp0

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/core/testing/interfaces.py (1)

86-93: Broad exception acceptable for cleanup, but consider logging the exception type.

The broad Exception catch is appropriate for cleanup code where we don't want close() failures to propagate. However, consider logging the exception type to help with debugging if unexpected exceptions occur during validation.

Apply this diff to log the exception type:

 try: close() - except Exception: + except Exception as e: if logger.isEnabledFor(logging.DEBUG): logger.debug( - "Failed to close coroutine produced during validation", + f"Failed to close coroutine produced during validation: {type(e).__name__}", exc_info=True, )

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd216cf and d8f0ea7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/core/testing/interfaces.py (2 hunks)
• tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Avoid using emojis in Python code comments or docstrings
Follow PEP 8 and use type hints for all functions
Import order must be: standard library, third-party, then local imports, separated by blank lines
Naming conventions: snake_case for variables and functions; PascalCase for classes
Error handling: use specific exceptions and include meaningful error messages
Prefer f-strings for string formatting

Files:

• tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py
• src/core/testing/interfaces.py

src/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

src/**/*.py: Catch specific exceptions; avoid broad except Exception blocks
If a broad exception must be caught, log with exc_info=True and re-raise a specific custom exception
Use the most specific exception class from src.core.common.exceptions that accurately describes the error
Provide clear, helpful error messages and include relevant details in the details dictionary of custom exceptions

Files:

• src/core/testing/interfaces.py

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py (2)

src/core/interfaces/session_service_interface.py (1)

• ISessionService (8-37)

src/core/testing/interfaces.py (2)

• TestServiceValidator (42-146)
• validate_session_service (49-109)

🪛 Ruff (0.13.3)

src/core/testing/interfaces.py

88-88: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)

---

96-100: Abstract raise to an inner function

(TRY301)

---

96-100: Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class

(TRY003)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: test (3.10)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/core/testing/interfaces.py (2)

71-71: LGTM! Good approach to capture async status upfront.

Storing the coroutine status before calling the method enables proper validation of the consistency between the method signature and its return value.

---

95-105: TestServiceValidator supports sync and async by design
SyncSessionManager’s synchronous get_session is an intended use-case to avoid coroutine warnings in tests. No changes required.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

tests/unit/core/testing/test_interfaces.py (1)

74-84: LGTM! Test correctly validates the new coroutine-friendly behavior.

The test changes properly reflect the updated validation logic:

• Renamed from bad_get_session to good_get_session to indicate the expected behavior
• Updated docstring to describe a "proper coroutine implementation"
• Removed the pytest.raises(TypeError) expectation, now asserting that validation passes
• Uses a properly declared async function that returns a Session

This correctly validates that well-behaved async implementations are now accepted by the validator.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/core/testing/interfaces.py	33.33%	4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[matdev83]

Closing this PR due to significant flaws identified during automated code review.