Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeper
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Nov 1, 2017

Version 4.1.1 of webpack-merge was just published.

Dependency webpack-merge
Current Version 3.0.0
Type devDependency

The version 4.1.1 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of webpack-merge.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 21 commits.

  • 2090a41 4.1.1
  • 2323879 Update lib
  • a40fbaf chore: Update changelog
  • f8d3e57 chore: Add @ahmehri to contributors
  • 6a21efa Merge pull request #93 from ahmehri/patch0
  • 114ef43 Add examples for customizeArray and customizeObject
  • d9559b9 4.1.0
  • ca835a7 Update lib
  • 5ad8c5f chore: Add @herecydev to contributors
  • 5b643d5 chore: Update changelog
  • 6bf19b6 Merge pull request #74 from herecydev/master
  • 9e21275 Added multiple merging to readme
  • 8b9d376 Formatting fixes
  • f62d69f Added more tests to cover upsert
  • 237117c Added merge multiple that outputs an array

There are 21 commits in total.

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@clavecoder clavecoder closed this Dec 9, 2017
@clavecoder clavecoder deleted the greenkeeper/webpack-merge-4.1.1 branch December 9, 2017 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

2 participants