Skip to content

Conversation

@ngoyal16
Copy link
Contributor

@ngoyal16 ngoyal16 commented Mar 1, 2021

Depericated apiVersion removed in Ingress resource

Depericated apiVersion removed in Ingress resource
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ngoyal16!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ngoyal16. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from M00nF1sh and kishorj March 1, 2021 09:13
@ngoyal16
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngoyal16 commented Mar 1, 2021

/assign @M00nF1sh

@ngoyal16
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngoyal16 commented Mar 1, 2021

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ngoyal16: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@M00nF1sh
Copy link
Member

M00nF1sh commented Mar 1, 2021

@ngoyal16
Thanks for making this PR.
would mind change it to networking.k8s.io/v1beta1 (the backend syntax differs from v1 slightly as well).
networking.k8s.io/v1 is not available for old supported EKS versions(e.g. 1.17) currently, and this file is used in EKS docs.

Another optional alternative is create another file like docs/examples/2048/2048_full_latest.yaml for latest apis.

@ngoyal16
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngoyal16 commented Mar 2, 2021

@M00nF1sh I have chanced the api version for now.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1850 (6f13eed) into main (88b90c0) will increase coverage by 0.35%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1850 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 47.62% 47.98% +0.35%  ========================================== Files 110 110 Lines 6110 6177 +67 ========================================== + Hits 2910 2964 +54  - Misses 2931 2938 +7  - Partials 269 275 +6 
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/service/model_build_target_group.go 82.31% <0.00%> (-0.67%) ⬇️
pkg/deploy/elbv2/target_group_binding_manager.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/service/model_builder.go 81.48% <0.00%> (+2.75%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88b90c0...0b8ab43. Read the comment docs.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2021
@tomislater
Copy link

tomislater commented Mar 4, 2021

Hmm, is this example valid?

We use networking.k8s.io/v1beta1, but the section

service: name: service-2048 port: number: 80 

is valid only in networking.k8s.io/v1 as far as I know.

In 1.18 we still must use networking.k8s.io/v1beta1: https://v1-18.docs.kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/ingress/#the-ingress-resource

Since 1.19 we can use networking.k8s.io/v1 (it will be removed in 1.22), and in this version we must use service.name, service.port.number, etc.: https://v1-19.docs.kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/ingress/#the-ingress-resource

BTW. Can I create/update on my EKS Cluster (1.19) an Ingress object (networking.k8s.io/v1) and aws-load-balancer-controller will create (or update existing one) ALB on AWS?

I have some Ingress objects currently on my cluster (networking.k8s.io/v1beta1) and I wonder if I can use a new version (networking.k8s.io/v1).

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 5, 2021
@ngoyal16
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngoyal16 commented Mar 5, 2021

@tomislater issue fixed.

Copy link
Member

@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
thanks for updating this :D

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: M00nF1sh, ngoyal16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2021
@M00nF1sh M00nF1sh merged commit f3e6276 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 13, 2021
Timothy-Dougherty pushed a commit to adammw/aws-load-balancer-controller that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
* remove depericated apiVersoin Depericated apiVersion removed in Ingress resource * Update 2048_full.yaml * Update 2048_full.yaml * Update echoserver-ingress.yaml * Update 2048_full.yaml * Update echoserver-ingress.yaml * Update 2048_full.yaml * Update echoserver-ingress.yaml * Update 2048_full.yaml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

5 participants