Skip to content

Conversation

caesarxuchao
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 8, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #282 into master will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 63.63%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #282 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 81.27% 81.32% +0.05%  ========================================== Files 41 41 Lines 4971 4979 +8 ========================================== + Hits 4040 4049 +9  + Misses 814 810 -4  - Partials 117 120 +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
config.go 88.7% <100%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
iter_object.go 64.97% <42.85%> (-1.13%) ⬇️
reflect.go 92.63% <50%> (-0.92%) ⬇️
reflect_struct_decoder.go 45.88% <80%> (+0.83%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8744d7c...b92cf78. Read the comment docs.

@caesarxuchao
Copy link
Contributor Author

I tried unit tests on the master branch and many tests were broken. I suspect it's caused by dependency issues? I used "dep ensure" to download dependencies. It's much appreciated If you have some pointers on how to solve the local unit test failures.

go test ./... output: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/caesarxuchao/go/test/testlog

@sai-g
Copy link

sai-g commented Jun 9, 2018

@caesarxuchao I faced the similar issue in running tests. I used the following command to fetch test dependencies, and it worked go get -t ./...

@taowen taowen merged commit 7cceb6c into json-iterator:master Jun 10, 2018
@caesarxuchao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @sai-g. I also installed the json-iter/go at the wrong path. After moving it to $GOPATH/github.com/json-iterator/go, and run go get -t ./..., I'm able to pass the test locally.

case 1:
for fieldName, fieldDecoder := range fields {
fieldHash := calcHash(fieldName)
fieldHash := calcHash(fieldName, ctx.caseSensitive())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this code above also make decoding case-insensitive?

for k, binding := range bindings { if _, found := fields[strings.ToLower(k)]; !found { fields[strings.ToLower(k)] = binding.Decoder.(*structFieldDecoder) } } 
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A test case that exercises positive and negative cases would be good

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened #285

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this code above also make decoding case-insensitive?

Yes, this was the culprit.

@nikhita nikhita mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2018
zhenzou pushed a commit to zhenzou/jsoniter that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
…sensitivity Make case sensitivity optional
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants