Ensure GetProviderSchema Response Error/Diagnostics are Unit Tested #177
Conversation
…agnostics in the GetProviderSchemaResponse (#176)
| type TestServerDiags struct { | ||
| *TestServer | ||
| Diagnostics []*tfprotov5.Diagnostic | ||
| } | ||
| | ||
| func (s *TestServerDiags) GetProviderSchema(ctx context.Context, req *tfprotov5.GetProviderSchemaRequest) (*tfprotov5.GetProviderSchemaResponse, error) { | ||
| resp, err := s.TestServer.GetProviderSchema(ctx, req) | ||
| | ||
| resp.Diagnostics = append(resp.Diagnostics, s.Diagnostics...) | ||
| | ||
| return resp, err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instead of setting up a new test server type, how do you feel about updating the existing TestServer to store a full GetProviderSchemaResponse *tfprotov5.GetProviderSchemaResponse field similar to PrepareProviderConfigResponse *tfprotov5.PrepareProviderConfigResponse?
We can migrate all the other GetProviderSchema related fields to be under that as well, rather than individually calling them out:
DataSourceSchemas map[string]*tfprotov5.Schema ProviderMetaSchema *tfprotov5.Schema ProviderSchema *tfprotov5.Schema ResourceSchemas map[string]*tfprotov5.Schema ServerCapabilities *tfprotov5.ServerCapabilities I'm going to peek at the other RPC logic and create an issue if it makes sense to do something similar for the other RPCs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good call. Have refactored.
| body: 'tf5muxserver: Include diagnostics returned from `server.GetProviderSchema()` | ||
| in `muxServer.GetProviderSchemaResponse`' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: I think we can tailor this message to developers without talking about the internal details, e.g.
tf5muxserver: Ensure GetProviderSchema RPC diagnostics are properly returned to Terraform
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense, have updated.
bendbennett changed the title 
| I'll try and circle back to take of Ensure ConfigureProvider Response Diagnostics are Unit Tested in the near future. |
| I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
2 participants
Closes: #176