- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
subscribe-test: extract subscribeWithBadFn function #3630
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
✅ Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
| Hi @yaacovCR, I'm @github-actions bot happy to help you with this PR 👋 Supported commandsPlease post this commands in separate comments and only one per comment:
|
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR added a commit to yaacovCR/graphql-js that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both
subscribeandcreateSourceEventStream.This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common
subscribeWithBadFnfunction.For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a
Promise<ExecutionResult>rather than aPromise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>). Because thesubscribeFnis expected to be "bad," anAsyncGeneratorshould never be returned. If a validsubscribeFnis mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered.extracted from #3620