RiteKit example #138
RiteKit example #138
Conversation
samples/RiteKit.gs Outdated
| function run() { | ||
| var service = getService(); | ||
| if (service.hasAccess()) { | ||
| console.log(service.getAccessToken()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please remove this debugging line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't understand why is no-console of lint not raised.
| var service = getService(); | ||
| if (service.hasAccess()) { | ||
| console.log(service.getAccessToken()); | ||
| var url = 'https://api.ritekit.com/v1/stats/multiple-hashtags?tags=php&access_token=' + service.getAccessToken(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optional: It looks like the API supports passing the access token in the header as well, which is what we show for most samples. Worth doing that here as well for consistency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've wrote to their support about this and I'm still waiting.
In my case I was need to use this as a module over a common system.
Let's waiting them.
I don't think that is a good example too.
2 days please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The docs here say that the header should work: https://ritekit.docs.apiary.io/#introduction/options-for-authorizing-api-calls (see option B).
| Ok. This feature can not be applied now. I talked to the developer and he suggests using only the |
2 participants
Some auth process don't require an authorization token header. It's strange. But there is a way to use the library. For this it's needed to setup
client_idandclient_secretas parameters.