Skip to content

Conversation

@jkwlui
Copy link
Member

@jkwlui jkwlui commented Dec 17, 2019

Requires #9869

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Dec 17, 2019
@jkwlui jkwlui changed the title Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-python/issues) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) feat(storage): support optionsRequestedPolicyVersion Dec 17, 2019
@jkwlui jkwlui changed the base branch from master to iam-proposal3 December 17, 2019 20:38
Copy link
Contributor

@frankyn frankyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, I have one nit question.

maintain compatibility with defaultdict remove in place raise KeyError on delete update deprecation for dict-key access and factory methods clean up maintain compatibility - removing duplicate in __setitems__ check for conditions for dict access remove empty binding fix test accessing private var _bindings fix(tests): change version to make existing tests pass tests: add tests for getitem, delitem, setitem on v3 and conditions test policy.bindings property fixlint black sort bindings by role when converting to api repr add deprecation warning for iam factory methods update deprecation message for role methods make Policy#bindings.members a set update policy docs fix docs make docs better fix: Bigtable policy class to use Policy.bindings add from_pb with conditions test add to_pb condition test blacken fix policy __delitem__ add docs on dict access do not modify binding in to_apr_repr
@jkwlui jkwlui force-pushed the storage-policy-version branch from 1badb64 to c210d29 Compare December 19, 2019 21:17
@jkwlui jkwlui requested a review from frankyn December 19, 2019 21:19
Copy link
Contributor

@frankyn frankyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@jkwlui jkwlui added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Dec 19, 2019
@jkwlui jkwlui changed the base branch from iam-proposal3 to master January 9, 2020 21:01
@jkwlui jkwlui added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Jan 9, 2020
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Jan 9, 2020
@jkwlui jkwlui requested review from crwilcox and frankyn January 9, 2020 23:46
@jkwlui
Copy link
Member Author

jkwlui commented Jan 9, 2020

@crwilcox fixed the builds. Would you mind taking a look again?

@jkwlui jkwlui merged commit 9b856cf into master Jan 13, 2020
@jkwlui jkwlui deleted the storage-policy-version branch January 13, 2020 21:05
This was referenced Jan 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing.

6 participants