Improve jsbeautify tests #97
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Prior to google#96 (3dad76a and 8e54240), the js-beautify binary was invoked with the wrong --type argument. This change verifies the js-beautify arguments for each of the supported filetypes (so that we can verify the fixes above), and also explains what's wrong with the javascript filetype support (it's picked up by clang-format instead).
| LGTM! |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to #96 (3dad76a and 8e54240), the js-beautify binary was invoked with the wrong --type argument.
This change verifies the js-beautify arguments for each of the supported filetypes (so that we can verify the fixes above), and also explains what's wrong with the javascript filetype support (it's picked up by clang-format instead).