Skip to content

Conversation

sam-mccall
Copy link
Contributor

@sam-mccall sam-mccall commented May 18, 2020

Copy link
Contributor

@dbarnett dbarnett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Sam!

One minor suggestion to add a clarifying note.

| return 1234567890; }<CR>
:call prop_type_add('keyword', {})
:call prop_add(1, 1, {'length': 3, 'type': 'keyword'})
:if has('textprop')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Add a note to clarify we're not verifying anything interesting in the !has('textprop') case. Something like this:

Suggested change
:if has('textprop')
This skips the textprop case if not supported (meaning this block won't do any
interesting verification when run in older versions of vim).
:if has('textprop')
@dbarnett
Copy link
Contributor

I can include these fixes in with other test fixes I'm making. Apparently we had a few different unhandled breakages lately.

@dbarnett
Copy link
Contributor

Obsoleted by #159.

@dbarnett dbarnett closed this Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3 participants