Make sure _get and _set dispatch up the class hierarchy #1539 
     +8   −4      
   Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.    
 
@dsnopek this is in response to my question from chat. It seems a bit odd to me that
_get_property_listdispatches up the class hierarchy while calls to_getand_setdo not and expect the developer to call the super type internally. I'm not sure whether we want to alter this behavior or leave it as-is and document this nuance for others who may prefer to use these override methods for property management.This change also seems to align the GDExtension behavior with C++ modules, too.