Skip to content

Conversation

strk
Copy link
Member

@strk strk commented Jan 5, 2018

Closes #3259

@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Jan 5, 2018

I don't know why the patch is served as type octect-stream instead of text/plain, ideas @bkcsoft ?

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 5, 2018
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrong comment

@lafriks lafriks added the type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. label Jan 5, 2018
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Jan 5, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3305 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 22.22%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #3305 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 35.08% 35.06% -0.02%  ========================================== Files 279 279 Lines 40526 40562 +36 ========================================== + Hits 14220 14225 +5  - Misses 24206 24229 +23  - Partials 2100 2108 +8
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
routers/routes/routes.go 87.1% <100%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
routers/repo/pull.go 33.75% <20%> (-0.58%) ⬇️
models/repo_indexer.go 52.91% <0%> (-0.98%) ⬇️
models/repo.go 43.19% <0%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
models/repo_list.go 67.18% <0%> (+1.56%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 18bb0f8...ab378fc. Read the comment docs.

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 6, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 6, 2018

@strk I would like this based on go-gitea/git#105

Copy link
Contributor

@thehowl thehowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two minor formatting nitpicks, otherwise looking good

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not `\+Hello, World \(Edited\)` (raw string)? Seems cleaner to me

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here.

@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Jan 6, 2018 via email

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jan 6, 2018

@strk he was suggesting to use golang raw strings to not to have escape backslash characters in it

@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Jan 6, 2018

Use of raw strings pushed. As per @lunny PR I'll wait for it to be merged before changing this one.
As usual, I'd rather not block things, and if @lunny adds to, rather than change the code, nothing will break...

Closes go-gitea#3259 Updates "git" module, for GetFormatPatch
@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Jan 7, 2018

I've updated to new git method and squash-rebased to master.
The updated code fixes inlinling of patch into browser, so ready to merge for me.

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 7, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 7, 2018

@strk you should handle io.Copy returned error.

@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Jan 7, 2018

error handled with 8243e4f

@lafriks lafriks merged commit 4405353 into go-gitea:master Jan 7, 2018
@strk strk deleted the serve-patch branch January 7, 2018 13:51
return
}

_, err = io.Copy(ctx, patch)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@strk You need to set the approriate Content-Type before this :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR is merged, if you can handle to test Content-Type in the existing integration test that'd be very useful (Content-Type was automatically added in previous implementation via ServeContent)

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.

7 participants