Skip to content

Conversation

mjcheetham
Copy link
Contributor

The git-credential-manager cask is part of the 'autobump' for the public tap of Homebrew.

We no longer need to maintain our own publishing workflow.

Error message when we try to publish our own package bump:

Error: Whoops, the git-credential-manager cask has its version update pull requests automatically opened by BrewTestBot every ~3 hours! We'd still love your contributions, though, so try another one that's not in the autobump list: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/master/.github/autobump.txt 

https://github.com/git-ecosystem/git-credential-manager/actions/runs/9879897955/job/27287165181

The `git-credential-manager` cask is part of the 'autobump' for the public tap of Homebrew. We no longer need to maintain our own publishing workflow. Error message when we try to publish our own package bump: ```log Error: Whoops, the git-credential-manager cask has its version update pull requests automatically opened by BrewTestBot every ~3 hours! We'd still love your contributions, though, so try another one that's not in the autobump list: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/master/.github/autobump.txt ```
@mjcheetham mjcheetham enabled auto-merge July 10, 2024 19:14
Copy link
Contributor

@dscho dscho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another contribution to the #dead-code-society 😄

@mjcheetham mjcheetham merged commit 85d9ee3 into git-ecosystem:main Jul 11, 2024
@mjcheetham mjcheetham deleted the rm-brew-yaml branch July 11, 2024 15:02
@mjcheetham mjcheetham mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
mjcheetham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
**Changes:** - Drop no longer needed workflows (#1659) - Documentation fixes (#1664, #1697) - Configurable GPG store path via Git config (#1698) - Fix Visual Studio build problems and update dependencies (#1711) - Support sending X5C with certificate auth (#1666)
Taufik067

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants